What are the "serious" libraries?

Joe Nelson joe at begriffs.com
Sat Apr 11 17:49:07 UTC 2020

June Bug wrote:
> Why do this all inside the Makefile? I think it would be easier to
> read as a simple configure script, and running ./configure before make
> is what’s expected. I write mine to output config.mk and `include
> config.mk` in my Makefile.

That's a much better idea, thank you! I see an example of what you mean
in one of your projects:

One question: in your Makefile why do you prefix include with a dash?

	-include config.mk

Doesn't that ignore errors in the execution of config.mk? I think I'd
like to be aware of any errors. This includes config.mk not existing, in
which case I'd like the main Makefile to complain.

More information about the Friends mailing list